Adoption of Recommended Fertilizer dose in Farmer’s Field of Bangladesh

Main Article Content

Tamanna Haque Mou
Md. Matiul Islam
Mohammad Bashir Ahmed

Abstract

The study was conducted to explore the farmer’s level of adoption of recommended fertilizer dose in the field. A survey was conducted at Batiaghata upazila of Khulna, Bangladesh during January to February in 2019 on purposive randomly selected 120 respondents in respect of selected twelve variables. The selected variables (characteristics of the respondents) were age, educational qualification, family size, farming experience, annual family income, farm size, organizational participation, agricultural training, cosmopolitanism, extension contact, attitude and practice. Two aspects of adoption i.e., innovativeness (time dimension) and extent of adoption (spatial dimension) of recommended fertilizer dose were considered as the focus variables. Data analysis was performed using SPSS (Statistical Package for Social Science) software version 20.0. To explore the relationship between the concerned variables Pearson’s Product Moment Coefficient of Correlation (r) for ratio data and Spearman’s Rank Order Correlation Coefficient (ρ) for ordinal data were employed. The result showed that majority of the  respondents were old aged (41.7%), had secondary level of education (56.70%), belonged to small family size (50%), had high annual family income (66.7%) and high farming experience (40%) with small farm size (76.67%). Majority of the respondents had low organizational participation (44.16%), low contact with extension agent (57.5%) and medium cosmopolitanism (57.5%) and had no agricultural training (59.2%). Findings also revealed that majority of the respondents (62.5%) showed high positive attitude towards adoption of recommended fertilizer dose. About half of the respondents (43.3%) belonged to medium practice category of recommended fertilizer dose in the field. Considering the innovativeness still 45.83% of the respondents belonged to late majority to laggard category of innovation diffusion, and still 36.66% land is not under recommended fertilizer dose application which significantly differ from the amount of land under recommended fertilizer dose application. Among 120 respondents there was no innovator. Among twelve variables age and farming experience had significant positive relation with their innovativeness, and educational qualification, annual family income, farm size and extension contact had significant positive relation with their extent of adoption of recommended fertilizer dose. Thus, it might be concluded that, the remaining farmers should be motivated to adopt and the remaining land should be practically taken under proper application of recommended fertilizer dose to sustain agricultural production in the field. 

Keywords:
Recommended fertilizer dose (RFD), adoption, innovativeness, agricultural practice.

Article Details

How to Cite
Mou, T., Islam, M., & Ahmed, M. (2019). Adoption of Recommended Fertilizer dose in Farmer’s Field of Bangladesh. Asian Journal of Agricultural Extension, Economics & Sociology, 34(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajaees/2019/v34i130189
Section
Original Research Article

References

Bangladesh Agricultural Research Council (BARC). Fertilizer recommendation guide -2012. Bangladesh Agricultural Research Council, Farmgate, New Airport Road, Dhaka – 1215. 2012;286.

Bangladesh Agricultural Research Council (BARC). Fertilizer Recommendation Guide - 2005. Bangladesh Agricultural Research Council, Farmgate, New Airport Road, Dhaka – 1215; 2005.

Bokhtiar SM, Sakurai K. Effects of organic manure and chemical fertilizer on soil fertility and productivity of plant and ratoon crops of sugarcane. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science. 2015;325334.

The Daily Star. Balanced fertilizer usage. The Daily Star; 2016.

Usman OAS, Dosumu OO. Cadmium analysis in fertilizers and groundwater samples in Dass Local Government Area of Bauchi State, Nigeria. Centerpoint (Science edition). 2007;208213.

Mercola. How organic farming could release us from the curse of fertilizer? 2013.
(Retrieved 8th February, 2017)
Available:https://healthimpactnews.com/2013/how-organic-farming-could-release-us-from-the-curse -of-fertilizer/.

Isaac F. Ministry of Agriculture, food security and cooperatives grades and standards in the fertilizer sub-sector in East and Central Africa - A case of Tanzania: In Proceedings of a Workshop on Rationalization and Harmonisation of Policies, Regulations, Procedures. 23 August 2007 at Land Mark Hotel, Dares Salaam, Tanzania. 2007;1–28.

Matata PZ, Ajay O, Coduol PA, Aggrey A. Socio-economic factors influencing adoption of improved fallow practices among smallholder farmers in western Tanzania. African Journal of Agricultural Research. 2010;5(8):818–823.

Mtenga KJ. Smallholder seed production in Tanzania: Potential and limitation. Dissertation for Award of M.Sc Degree at Sokoine University of Agriculture, Morogoro, Tanzania. 1999;132.

Nanai NAK. Peasant participation in community development projects: Implication in laying a strategy for participatory extension. Dissertation for Award of MSc Degree at Sokoine University of Agriculture, Morogoro, Tanzania. 1993;138.

Kusmiati I, Subekti U, Windari W. Adoption of livestock farmers against implementation of Artificial insemination in goats nuts in Sawahan Sub-District Madiun Regency, East Java. Journal of Agriculture Sciences. 2007;3(1):36–47.

Kassie M, Jaleta M, Shiferaw B, Mbando F and Muricho G. Plot and household-level determinants of sustainable agricultural practices in rural Tanzania. Environment for Development. Discussion Paper Series; 2012.
Available:http://www.efdinitiative.org.

Asfaw S, Shiferaw B, Simtowe, Franklin P and Mekbib G. Agricultural technology adoption, seed access constraints and commercialization in Ethiopia. Journal of Development and Agricultural Economics. 2011;3(9):436-447.

Drechsel P, Olaleye A, Adeoti A, Thiombiano L, Barry B and Vohland K. Adoption driver and constraints of resource conservation technologies in sub-Saharan Africa; 2005.
Available:http://www.iwmi.cgiar.org/africa/west/pdf/AdoptionConstraints-Overview.pdf.

Rogers EM. Diffusion of Innovations (3rd ed.). New York: The Free Press; 1962.

Kabir H. Adaptation and adoption of the System of Rice Intensification (SRI) in Myanmar using the Farmer Field School (FFS) Approach. PhD Thesis, University of Honolulu; 2006.
Available:http://ciifad.cornell.edu/sri/theses/kabirthesis-pdf.

Nhemachena C, Hassan R. Micro-level analysis of farmers adaptation to climate change in Southern Africa. IFPRI Discussion Paper No. 00714. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute; 2007.

Obayelu OA, Adepoju AO and Idowu T. Factors influencing farmers’ choices of adaptation to climate change in Ekiti State, Nigeria. Journal of Agriculture and Environment for International Development. 2014;108(1):3-16.

Kothari CR. Research methodology: methods and techniques (2nd Rev. Ed.), New Age International Publishers, New Delhi; 2004.

Pervin S, Chowdhury AR, Islam MM, Ahmed MB and Ara R. Present status and problem confrontation of oilseed cultivation in southwest region of Bangladesh, Journal of Bangladesh Agricultural University. 2018;16(2):198-207.
DOI: 10.3329/jbau.v16i2.37961.

Shiduzzaman M, Akhter H, Ahmed MB, Islam MM. Farmers' perception regarding vermicompost. Research in Agriculture Livestock and Fisheries. 2018;5(1):19-25.