Effect of Technological Intervention on Yield of Summer Pearl Millet

Main Article Content

S. K. Parmar
K. D. Mungra
J. S. Sorathiya
H. G. Vansjalia


Front line demonstrations (FLDs) were conducted by pearl millet Research Station, JAU, Jamnagar on 313 farmers’ field in 125 hectares of different 98 villages of Gujarat state during summer season of 2015 to 2019. Prevailing farm practices were treated as control for comparison with recommended package i.e. improved variety (GHB 558, GHB 538, GHB 732), seed rate 4 kg/ha, timely sowing (15 Feb to 15 March), line sowing with spacing of 60 cm (R-R) and 10-12 cm (P-P), balanced use of fertilizers (NPK @120:60:0 kg/ha, thinning 15 days after sowing, weed management (pre emergence spray of Atrazin @ 0.5 kg/ha and one hand weeding), proper critical stage apply 8-10 irrigation, two foliar spray of profenophos 0.05 % at 20 and 40 days after germination to control shoot fly and stem borer pests infesting pearl millet, timely harvesting and threshing. The cumulative effect of technological intervention over five years, revealed average grain yield 4362 kg/ha and dry fodder yield 7365 kg/ha which is 6.17% and 12.76% higher over the farmers’ practices. The economics and cost benefit ratio of both farmers’ and improved practices was worked out. On an average net profit was obtained 6837 11111.png/ha due to adoption of improved package of practices. The average cost benefit ratio was 2.23 under improved demonstration practices, while it was 2.43 under farmers’ practices. By conducting the Front line demonstrations of proven technologies, yield potential and net income from pearl millet cultivation can be enhanced to a great extent with increase in the income level of the farming community.

FLDs, front line demonstration, net profit, pearl millet

Article Details

How to Cite
Parmar, S. K., Mungra, K. D., Sorathiya, J. S., & Vansjalia, H. G. (2019). Effect of Technological Intervention on Yield of Summer Pearl Millet. Asian Journal of Agricultural Extension, Economics & Sociology, 34(4), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajaees/2019/v34i430206
Original Research Article


Yadav OP, Mahala, RS, Rai KN, Gupta SK, Rajpurohit BS and Yadav HP. Pearl millet seed production and processing. AICRP on Pearl Millet, ICAR publication, Jodhpur; 2015.

Anonymous. Directorate of agriculture, Department of agriculture, Gujarat State, Gandhinagar; 2019.
(Accessed on 12 July 2019)

Gill KS. Pearl millet and its Improvement. ICAR publications, New Delhi; 1991.

Chaudhari RP, Patel PM, Patel BM, Kumar Upesh, Darji SS, Patel SJ. Performance of Summer Pearl Millet (Pennisetum glaucum L.) Hybrids under North Gujarat Conditions. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. App. Sci. 2018;7(1):637-644.

Chadhuary BN. Publication, Division of Agricultural Extension, ICAR, 1999;73-78.

Samui, SK, Maitra S, Roy DK, Mondal AK and Saha D. Evaluation on front line demonstration on groundnut (Arachis hypogea L.). J. Indian Soc. Coastal Agri. Res. 2000;18:180-183.

Thakur C, Sahu B, Markam S, Nag U. Impact of front line demonstration on yield and economics of chickpea (Cicer arietinum) in Uttar-Bastar Kanker District of Chhattisgarh. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. App. Sci. 2019;8(6):2337- 2341.

Parmar GM, Mehta AC, Acharya MF and Parmar SK. Impact of frontline demonstration in transfer of pearl millet production technology. Int. J. Agril. Sci. 2016;8(22):1417-1418.

Zala SU, Patel KA, Thakor RF. Agriculture Update. 2013;8(3):517-518.