The Individual Youth-related Factors Influencing the Extent of Youth Engagement in Development Interventions in Western Kenya
Samuel Omondi Osike *
Department of Sociology and Anthropology, Makerere University, P.O. Box, 7062, Kampala, Uganda and Department of Peace, Security and Social Studies, Egerton University, Kenya.
Robert Kabumbuli
Department of Sociology and Anthropology, Makerere University, P.O. Box, 7062, Kampala, Uganda.
Achilles Ssewaya
Department of Sociology and Anthropology, Makerere University, P.O. Box, 7062, Kampala, Uganda.
*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Abstract
This paper discusses the factors affecting how much the youth are engaged in development programmes. Despite development interventions that the government and its partners have embarked on to promote youth development in Kenya, there is room for improvement in youth engagement. The study utilized a pragmatism research philosophy, incorporating qualitative and quantitative research methods within a mixed-methods research framework and concurrent triangulation research design. Using simple random sampling procedure, 329 youths were selected for the quantitative component, while 18 participants were selected purposively for the qualitative component. Quantitative data was collected through the survey method using interviewer-administered questionnaires, while qualitative data was gathered through key informant and in-depth interviews. Quantitative data were analysed statistically, while qualitative data were analysed thematically. Results show the highest proportion of respondents (41.7%) had low extent of engagement in development interventions. Individual youth factors such as the level of education (p=.0120), age cohort (p=.027), and locality (p=.010), and level of independence (p=.05) influenced the extent of youth engagement in development interventions. However, the gender of the youth, marital status, parental economic status, parental occupation and parental/guardians’ level of education had no statistically significant relationship with the extent of youth engagement. Tailoring youth development interventions to the unique characteristics of all youths is recommended based on this paper's conclusion that low youth engagement was attributed to individual youth-related factors. Additionally, programme managers should encourage genuine youth involvement in all stages of interventions’ development to ensure that they own interventions that target them.
Keywords: Individual youth-related factors, youth, youth development, youth development intervention, youth engagement
How to Cite
References
Iwasaki Y. The role of youth engagement in positive youth development and social justice youth development for high-risk, marginalised youth. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 2016;21(3): 267-278 Available:https://doi.org/10.1080/02673843.2015.1067893
Krauss SE, Zeldin S, Abdullah H, Ortega A, Ali Z, Ismail IA, Ariffin Z. Malaysian youth associations as places for empowerment and engagement. Children and Youth Services Review. 2020;104939 Available:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.104939
Roth JL, Brooks-Gunn J. Evaluating youth development programs: Progress and promise. Applied developmental science, 2016;20(3):188-202. Available:https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2015.1113879
Chigunta F. Youth entrepreneurship: Meeting the key policy challenges: Education Development Center Waltham, MA; 2002
GoK. Kenya Youth Development Policy. Nairobi: Government Printers; 2019.
Kenya LO. The Constitution of Kenya: 2010: Chief Registrar of the Judiciary; 2013
Pancer SM, Rose‐Krasnor L, Loiselle LD. Youth conferences as a context for engagement. New Directions for Youth Development. 2002;(96):47-64. Available:https://doi.org/10.1002/yd.26
Farthing R. Why youth participation? Some justifications and critiques of youth participation using New Labour’s youth policies as a case study. Youth & policy. 2012;109(109):71-97.
Jannemiek E. Position Paper: Meaningful Youth Participation; 2018 Available:https://share-netinternational.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/SNI_Meaningful_Youth_Participation.pdf
Iwasaki Y, Dashora P, McHugh TL, McLaughlin AM, Springett J. Reflections on the opportunities and challenges of youth engagement: Youth and professional perspectives. Engaged Scholar Journal: Community-Engaged Research, Teaching, and Learning. 2015;1(2). Available:https://doi.org/10.15402/esj.v1i2.111
Willis C, Girdler S, Thompson M, Rosenberg M, Reid S, Elliott C. Elements contributing to meaningful participation for children and youth with disabilities: a scoping review. Disability and Rehabilitation. 2017;39(17):1771-1784.
Available:https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2016.1207716
Van Reeuwijk M. Meaningful Youth participation as a way to achieving success. Canadian Journal of Children's Rights/Revue canadienne des droits des enfants. 2018;5(1):200-222. Available:https://doi.org/10.22215/cjcr.v5i1.1301
Eccles JS, Gootman JA. Committee on Community-Level Programs for Youth, National Research Council (US), Board on Children Youth and Families, and Institute of Medicine (US). Community Programs to Promote Youth Development; 2002
Pittman KJ, Irby M, Tolman J, Yohalem N., Ferber T. Preventing problems, promoting development, encouraging engagement. Paper presented at the Washington, DC: Forum for Youth Investment; 2011.
Taylor RD, Oberle E, Durlak JA, Weissberg RP. (). Promoting positive youth development through school‐based social and emotional learning interventions: A meta‐analysis of follow‐up effects. Child Development. 2017;88(4):1156-1171 Available:https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12864
Benson P, Pittman K. Moving the youth development message: Turning a vague idea into a moral imperative. Trends in Youth Development: Visions, Realities, and Challenges, 2001;3-50.
Benson PL, Leffert N, Scales PC, Blyth D A. Beyond the village” rhetoric: Creating healthy communities for children and adolescents. Applied Developmental Science. 2012;16(1):3-23.
Available:https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532480xads0203_3
Oduor C, Muriu A. Opportunities for youth to engage in devolved governance and economic development in Kenya. The Futures Bulletin, Institute of Economic Affairs (IEA); 2013
Hope Sr KR. Engaging the youth in Kenya: empowerment, education, and employment. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth. 2012;17(4):221-236. Available:https://doi.org/10.1080/02673843.2012.657657
Sikenyi M. Does Kenya’s Youth Enterprise Development Fund Serve Young People?; 201 DOI:10.19088/1968-2017.131
UNDP K. Kenya National Human Development Report 2009: youth and human development: tapping the untapped resource. Nairobi: UNDP Kenya; 2010.
Damon W. What is positive youth development-The Annals of American Academy of Political and Social Science; 2004.
Ersing RL. Building the capacity of youths through community cultural arts. Best Practices in Mental Health. 2009;5(1):26-43.
Benson PL, Scales PC, Hamilton SF, Sesma Jr, A. Positive youth development: Theory, research, and applications. Handbook of Child Psychology. 2007;1. Available:https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470147658.chpsy0116
Pancer SM, Pratt MW. Social and family determinants of community service involvement in Canadian youth. Roots of civic identity: International perspectives on community service and activism in youth, 1999; 32-55.
Hurd AT. Focus on Youth: Awakening Youth Voice & Engagement in Community Heritage through the Implementation of a Youth Participatory Empowerment Model; 2020
Doss CR, Heckert J, Myers E, Pereira A, Quisumbing A. (). Gender, rural youth and structural transformation: evidence to inform innovative youth programming; 2020. Available at SSRN 3520616
Kimaro PJ, Towo NN. Determinants of rural youth’s participation in agricultural activities: the case of Kahe East ward in Moshi rural district, Tanzania. International Journal of Economics, Commerce and Management. .2015;3(2):33.
Mkwakwami MC. An investigation of the challenges faced by non-governmental organisations in promoting youth development in Mutare rural district from 2018;2008-2012.
Nnadi F, Akwiwu C. Determinants of youths’ participation in rural agriculture in Imo State, Nigeria. Journal of Applied Sciences. 2008;8(2):328-333. DOI:10.3923/jas.2008.328.333
Agwu NM, Nwankwo EE, Anyanwu CI. (2014). Determinants of agricultural labour participation among youths in Abia State, Nigeria. International Journal of Food and Agricultural Economics (IJFAEC), 2(1128-2016-92018).2014;157-164. Available:http://dx.doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.163717
Ahaibwe G, Mbowa S, Lwanga MM. Youth engagement in agriculture in Uganda: Challenges and prospects; 2013
Ampaire EL, Acosta M, Huyer S, Kigonya R, Muchunguzi P, Muna R, Jassogne L. Gender in climate change, agriculture, and natural resource policies: insights from East Africa. Climatic Change. 2020158(1), 43-60 Available:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-019-02447-0
Ibidapo I, Faleye O, Akintade T, Oso O, Owasoyo E. Determinants of youth participation in dry season vegetables cultivation in urban areas of Ondo State, Nigeria. Journal of Agricultural Science and Practice. 2017;2:109-114.
Lindsey LL. Gender roles: A sociological perspective: Routledge; 2015
Mutua E, Bukachi S, Bett B, Estambale B. B, Nyamongo I. Youth participation in smallholder livestock production and marketing; 2017. IDSB51.1A_10.190881968-2020.121
Bunde A, Kibet K. Socio-Economic Factors Influencing Adoption of Modern Bee Keeping Technologies in Baringo County, Kenya. International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR), 2016;5(6): 960-969. Available:http://dx.doi.org/10.21275/v5i6.NOV164195
Mdege N, Mayanja S, Mudege NN. (2022). Youth engagement in sweetpotato production
and agribusiness: the case of Northern Uganda. Third World Quarterly. 2022; 43(10), 2430-2449 Available:https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2022.2094236
Ng’atigwa AA, Hepelwa A, Yami M, Manyong V. Assessment of factors influencing youth involvement in horticulture agribusiness in Tanzania: A case study of Njombe Region. Agriculture, 2020;10(7):287 Available:https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture10070287
French M, Bhattacharya S, Olenik C. Youth engagement in development: effective approaches and action-oriented recommendations for the field. Washington DC: United States Agency for Intenational Development; 2014
Akiva T, Cortina KS, Smith C. Involving youth in program decision-making: How common and what might it do for youth? Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 2014;43(11):1844-1860.
DOI 10.1007/s10964-014-0183-y
Majee W, Anakwe A. Youth engagement: A mixed method investigation of adult and youth perceptions of community resources in rural America. Community Development. 2019;1-17. Available:https://doi.org/10.1080/15575330.2019.1689517
Majee W, Anakwe A, Jooste K. Youth and Young Adults These Days: Perceptions of Community Resources and Factors Associated with Rural Community Engagement. Journal of Rural Social Sciences, 2020;35(1):1 Aavailable:https://egrove.olemiss.edu/jrss/vol35/ iss1/1
Österbacka E. Family Background and Economic Status in Finland. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 2001;103(3):467-484. Available:https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9442.00255
Alexander K, Entwisle D, Olson L. The long shadow: Family background, disadvantaged urban youth, and the transition to adulthood: Russell Sage Foundation; 2014
Christens BD, Peterson NA. The role of empowerment in youth development: A study of sociopolitical control as mediator of ecological systems’ influence on developmental outcomes. Journal of Youth and Adolescence. 2012;41(5):623-635. DOI:10.1007/s10964-011-9724-9
Crawford C, Dearden L, Micklewright J, Vignoles A. Family background and university success: Differences in higher education access and outcomes in England: Oxford University Press; 2016.
Heap V, Waters J. Data collection methods. In Mixed Methods in Criminology Routledge. 2019;141-176
Edmonds WA, Kennedy TD. An applied guide to research designs: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods: Sage Publications; 2016.
Johnson RB, Onwuegbuzie AJ. Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher. 2004;33(7):14-26.
Teddlie C, Tashakkori A. Foundations of mixed methods research: Integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches in the social and behavioral sciences: Sage; 2009
Hesse-Biber SN, Johnson RB. The Oxford handbook of multimethod and mixed methods research inquiry: Oxford University Press; 2015
Creswell JW, Clark VLP. Designing and conducting mixed methods research: Sage Publications; 2017
Wilkinson A, Pettifor A, Rosenberg M, Halpern CT, Thirumurthy H, Collinson M. A, Kahn K. The employment environment for youth in rural South Africa: A mixed-methods study. Development Southern Africa. 2017;34(1):17-32. Available:https://doi.org/10.1080/0376835X.2016.1259986
Rowe NF. Sporting capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis of sport participation determinants and its application to sports development policy and practice. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics. 2015;7(1):43-61. Available:https://doi.org/10.1080/19406940.2014.915228
Schaefer I. Political revolt and youth unemployment in Tunisia: Exploring the education-employment mismatch: Springer; 2017.
Chipeta E, Surujlal J, Koloba H. Influence of gender and age on social entrepreneurship intentions among university students in Gauteng province, South Africa. Gender and Behaviour. 2016;14(1):6885-6899.
Bowles S, Gintis H, Groves MO. Unequal chances: Family background and economic success: Princeton University Press; 2009
Kaki RS, Mignouna DB, Aoudji AK, Adéoti R. Entrepreneurial intention among undergraduate agricultural students in the Republic of Benin. Journal of African Business. 2022;1-18. Available:https://doi.org/10.1080/15228916.2022.2031584