Main Article Content
Rainfed areas are subjected to climate change through extreme weather events, decrease of water availability and decrease in agricultural productivity. The problem to be addressed is the limited access to and exchange of, information and knowledge related to agriculture and food security at local, national, and regional levels. Krishi Vigyan Kendras (KVKs) act as a crucial player in technology assessment, refinement and demonstration. Technology adoption to be successful depends on successful technology assessment, refinement and demonstration. Hence, the role of KVKs is of paramount importance in the above processes. KVK Rangareddy district of Telangana state (South India) is attached to the Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture (CRIDA), Hyderabad. The study was conducted in three KVK adopting villages’ of Pudur mandal, Rangareddy district, Telangana state. The objectives of the study are to assess the extent of adoption of KVK technologies, factors affecting and constraints in adoption; to assess the impact of KVK technologies in terms of improved productivity in crops, livestock, income levels of farm women; and to assess the gain in knowledge levels. A sample of 40 farmers each from adopting and non-adopting categories in the same villages was selected for data collection, thus, making a total sample of 240 farmers. The data was collected using a pre-tested interview schedule from the farmers. Focus group discussion and interviews were conducted to elicit data. Data was analysed using descriptive statistics (frequencies and percentages) and inferential statistics (correlation, multiple linear regression and adoption indices). Final data was averaged from the three villages both for adopting and non-adopting category of farmers and presented. More than 60% adoption was recorded for production technology and stem borer management in maize; spacing and fertilizer management in cotton; and demonstration of perennial fodder hybrid Bajra Napier CO-4 etc. T-test scores showed significant higher mean values for adopters over non-adopters except in the case of the variable age. Adopters had better knowledge and adoption rates over non-adopters. Productivity of farmers increased between 33-57% with KVK technologies. Income levels of farm women increased three to four times based on the enterprise after adoption. Farmers’ adoption of technologies requires more concerted efforts in establishing mechanisms and traits including readiness of availability, ease of use, low cost, low labor requirement and time requirements of different technologies and their components. The adoption results of KVK technologies/interventions in case of non adopting category of farmers were found to be meager.
CRIDA. Annual Report 2008-09. Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad, A.P, India: 130.
Rogers EM. Diffusion of innovations. Macmillan Company, USA; 1962.
Feder G, Just RE, Zilberman D. Adoption of agricultural innovations in developing countries: A survey. Economic Develop-ment and Cultural Change. 1985;33:255–297.
Suri T. Selection and comparative advantage in technology adoption. National Bureau of Economic Research; 2009. Working Paper No. 15346.
(Accessed 14 April, 2010)
Marra M, Pannell DJ, Ghadim AA. The economics of risk, uncertainty and learning in the adoption of new agricultural technologies: Where are we on the learning curve? Agricultural Systems. 2003;75(2/3):215-234.
Tsur YM, Sternberg, Hocham E. Dynamic modeling of innovation process adoption with risk aversion and learning. Oxford Economic Papers. 1990;42:336-355.Leathers HD, Smale M. A Bayesian approach to explaining sequential adoption of components of a technological package. American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 1992;68:519-527.
Feder G, Umali DL. The adoption of agricultural innovations: A review. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 1993;43:215-239.
Jones, Kelly Michelle. Technology adoption in West Africa: Adoption and disadoption of soybeans on the Togo-Benin border. M.S. Thesis, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC; 2005.
Marsh S, Pannell D, Lindner R. The impact of agricultural extension on adoption and diffusion of lupines as a new crop in Western Australia. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture. 2000;40:571-583.
Llewellyn RS, Lindner RK, Pannell DJ, Powles SB. Effective information and the influence of an extension event on perceptions and adoption. Paper Presented at the 47th Annual Conference of the Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, Fremantle, Western Australia, February 12-14; 2003.
Wasnik SM. Adoption of dry farming technology in progressive and non-progressive villages. Maharashtra Journal of Extension Education. 1988;7:201-204.
Farooque Mohammed. A study on the adoption behavior of farmers of drought prone area, Aurangabad District of Maharashtra State. M.Sc. (Agri.) Thesis, University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad, Karnataka; 1990.
Ndove TS, Whitbread AM, Clark RA, Pengelly BC. Identifying the factors that contribute to the successful adoption of improved farming practices in the smallholder sector of Limpopo Province, South Africa. In: Tropical legumes for sustainable farming systems in southern Africa and Australia, Editors. Whitbread AM, Pengelly BC. ACIAR Proceedings series, Australian Centre for International Research. 2004;115:146-153.
Padmaiah M, Rammohan Rao MS, Chittaranjan S, Selvaraj S. Impact of watershed management programme on knowledge, attitude and adoption behaviour of farmers in Joladarasi Watershed of Bellary District, Karnataka. Indian Journal of Soil Conservation. 1992;20(1&2):37-43.
Dakhore KM, Mahajan BS, Digraskar SU. Adoption of dryland technology by farmers. Maharashtra Journal of Extension Education. 1993;12:215-218.
Dhayal BL, Mehta BM. Study on knowledge and adoption of green gram production technology by farmers in Chhota Udaipur District of Gujarat. Agriculture Update. 2015;10(4):318-322.
Singha AK, Bardoloi R, Jat PC, Singha JK, Devi M. Socio-economic profile of the common adopters of improved practices of crops and livestock enterprises and their problems and suggestive measures-A case study in adopting and non-adopting villages in North Eastern India. Economic Affairs. 2016;61(2):289-298.
Thinde LK, Sai AK, Parmar K, Hembram D, Pal D, Kushwaha RK. Socio-economic characteristics of wheat growers regarding adoption of improved wheat production technology in Kanpur Dehat District, Uttar Pradesh (India). International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences. 2017;6(12):2319-7706.
Siddayya Dandekar AK, Kammar KS. Adoption pattern of improved pigeon pea varieties in Kalaburagi District, Karnataka, India. Agricultural Science Digest. 2016;36(4):255-260.
Pramod Mandavkar, Manoj Tilathi. Adoption level of oilseed production technology in Konkan Region of Maharashtra. Journal of Krishi Vigyan. 2013;2(1):1-4.
Doss CR. Analyzing technology adoption using microstudies: limitations, challenges, and opportunities for improvement. Agricultural Economics. 2006;34(3):207-219.
Endale K. Fertilizer consumption and agricultural productivity in Ethiopia. EDRI Working Paper 003 Yu B, Nin-Pratt A, Funes J and Gemessa, SA. Cereal Production and Technology Adoption in Ethiopia. IFPRI Discussion Paper 01131:.27; 2011.
Yu B, Nin-Pratt A, Funes J, Gemessa SA. Cereal production and technology adoption in Ethiopia. IFPRI Discussion Paper 01131:.27; 2011.
Lambert DM, Paudel KP, Larson JA. Bundled adoption of precision agriculture technologies by cotton producers. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics. 2015;40(2):325-345.
Uma Maheswara Rao D, Sridhar G. Knowledge gain among the beneficiaries of Krishi Vigyan Kendra through its technology transfer through demonstrations compared to non beneficiaries – A case study of Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Visakhapatnam district. International Journal of Innovative Research in Science, Engineering and Technology. 2014;3(1):8870-8873.
Deepa Indoria, Balai CM. Farm women empowerment through secondary agriculture. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences. 2018;7(8):4131-4137. ISSN: 2319-706.