Asian Journal of Agricultural Extension, Economics & Sociology

  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Submissions & Author Guideline
    • Accepted Papers
    • Editorial Policy
    • Editorial Board Members
    • Reviewers
    • Propose a Special Issue
    • Printed Hard copy
    • Subscription
    • Membership
    • Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement
    • Digital Archiving
    • Contact
  • Archives
  • Indexing
  • Publication Charge
  • Submission
  • Testimonials
  • Announcements
Advanced Search
  1. Home
  2. Archives
  3. 2021 - Volume 39 [Issue 4]
  4. Original Research Article

Submit Manuscript


Subscription



  • Home Page
  • Author Guidelines
  • Editorial Board Member
  • Editorial Policy
  • Propose a Special Issue
  • Membership

Evaluating Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices of Livestock Value Chain Actors on Climate Smart Agriculture/Livestock (CSA/L) in Kajiado County, Kenya

  • Mary W. Thongoh
  • H. M. Mutembei
  • J. Mburu
  • B. E. Kathambi

Asian Journal of Agricultural Extension, Economics & Sociology, Page 134-148
DOI: 10.9734/ajaees/2021/v39i430568
Published: 15 May 2021

  • View Article
  • Download
  • Cite
  • References
  • Statistics
  • Share

Abstract


The livestock sector is a major contributor to food security and is mainly practiced by the rural poor but faces climate related threats. While there are many natural occurrences impacting the average global temperature and consequently livestock production, human activities in the sector continue to be a main contributing factor to climate change as a result of greenhouse gas emissions. However there has been little attention paid to integration of climate smart initiatives into livestock production and beyond into the value chains especially in ASALs where 80% of livestock production is found. A mixed method approach was used to evaluate KAP (knowledge, attitudes and practices) of the Livestock value chain actors (MSMEs). Linking Climate Smart Agriculture (CSA) to MSMEs within the livestock sector value chains is imperative to producers’ engagements within the livestock value chain, reducing climate risks and increasing resilience. The study revealed that actors relate climate change to weather variability, extreme weather conditions and drought and CSA/Livestock as a concept is not well understood; there is a general knowledge of climate change albeit with low understanding on its relationship with livestock, and concern among the value chain actors on the impacts of climate change on productivity and the willingness to take part in actions aimed at protecting the environment and mitigating climate change. There is need to provide context-based CSA technologies, innovation, and management practices (TIMPs) tailored to pastoral livestock production and ASALs value chains, strengthening of peer-to-peer learning and improving extension services to increase awareness, trainings and enhance adoption of CSA since most actors interact with extension officers, and with each other along the chains.


Keywords:
  • Climate Smart Agriculture/Livestock (CSA/L)
  • Technology
  • Innovations
  • and Management Practices (TIMPs)
  • climate smart value chains
  • climate change
  • knowledge
  • practices
  • attitude
  • MSMEs
  • Full Article – PDF
  • Review History

How to Cite

Thongoh, M. W., Mutembei, H. M., Mburu, J., & Kathambi, B. E. (2021). Evaluating Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices of Livestock Value Chain Actors on Climate Smart Agriculture/Livestock (CSA/L) in Kajiado County, Kenya. Asian Journal of Agricultural Extension, Economics & Sociology, 39(4), 134-148. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajaees/2021/v39i430568
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver

References

FAO. Value chain analysis: A case study of mangoes in Kenya. Sugar and Beverages Group Raw Materials, Tropical and Horticultural Products Service Commodities and Trade Division Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. 2013;11.

Mureithi, Stephen M, Verdoodt, Ann, Njoka, Jesse, Gachene, Charles, Meyerhoff, Elizabeth, Van Ranst, Eric. Benefits derived from rehabilitating a degraded semi-arid rangeland in communal enclosures, Kenya. Land Degradation & Development. 2014;27.
DOI:10.1002/ldr.2341.

Wreford, Anita, Ignaciuk, Ada, Gruere, Guillaume. Overcoming Barriers to the Adoption of Climate-Friendly Practices in Agriculture; 2017.
DOI:10.1787/97767de8-en.

Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock, F, I. Agricultural sector transformation and growth strategy: towards sustainable agricultural transformation and food security In Kenya. 2018;46.

Tánago, Itziar, Urquijo Reguera, Julia, Blauhut, Veit, Villarroya, Fermin, De Stefano, Lucia.. Learning from experience: A systematic review of assessments of vulnerability to drought. Natural Hazards. 2016;80.
DOI:10.1007/s11069-015-2006-1.

World Bank. The World Bank Annual Report 2019: Ending Poverty, Investing in Opportunity. Washington, DC: World Bank. © World Bank; 2019. Available:https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/32333 License: CC BY-NC-ND 3.0 IGO

Stein C, Barron J. Mapping actors along value chains: integrating visual network research and participatory statistics into value chain analysis. Mapping Actors along Value Chains: Integrating Visual Network Research and Participatory Statistics into Value Chain Analysis; 2017. DOI:https://doi.org/10.5337/2017.216

Stoian D, Donovan J, Fisk J, Muldoon MF. Value chain development for rural poverty reduction: a reality check and a warning. Financial and Market Integration of Vulnerable People, September. 2015;71–86.
DOI:https://doi.org/10.3362/9781780448879.006

World Bank. The World Bank Annual Report 2012 : Responding with Knowledge and Experience. World Bank Annual Report;. Washington, DC. © World Bank. 2012;2. Available:https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/11845 License: CC BY 3.0 IGO.

Ogutu JO, Piepho HP, Said MY, Ojwang GO, Njino LW, Kifugo SC, et al. Extreme Wildlife Declines and Concurrent Increase in Livestock Numbers in Kenya: What Are the Causes? PLoS ONE. 2016;11(9):e0163249.
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163249

Mirzabaev A. Improving the resilience of central asian agriculture to weather variability and climate change. In Natural Resource Management and Policy. Springer. 2018;52:477–495. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61194-5_19

Grossi, Giampiero, Goglio, Pietro, Vitali, Andrea, Williams, Adrian. Livestock and climate change: Impact of livestock on climate and mitigation strategies. Animal Frontiers. 2018;9. DOI:10.1093/af/vfy034.

Nations U. Climate change, Impacts, Adaptation, Ports, Seaports, Coastal transportation © 2019; 2019.

Sourcebook S. Climateesmart Agriculture; 2013.
Available:www.fao.org/

Karami S, Shobeiri SM, Jafari H, Jafari H. Assessment of knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) towards climate change education (CCE) among lower secondary teachers in Tehran, Iran. International Journal of Climate Change Strategies and Management. 2017b;9(3):402–415.
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCCSM-04-2016-0043

Meijer, Seline, Catacutan, Delia, Ajayi, Oluyede Olu, Sileshi, Gudeta, Nieuwenhuis, Maarten. The role of knowledge, attitudes and perceptions in the uptake of agricultural and agroforestry innovations among smallholder farmers in sub-Saharan Africa. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability. 2014;13.
DOI:10.1080/14735903.2014.912493

Mwongera C, Nowak A, Notenbaert AMO, Grey S, Osiemo J, Kinyua I, Lizarazo M, Girvetz E. Climate-Smart Agricultural Value Chains: Risks and Perspectives. In The Climate-Smart Agriculture Papers. Springer International Publishing. 2019a;235–245. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92798-5_20

Fielding, Kelly, Hornsey, Matthew. A social identity analysis of climate change and environmental attitudes and behaviors: Insights and opportunities. Frontiers in Psychology. 2016;7.
DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00121.

Raciti, Steve, Groffman, Peter, Jenkins, Jennifer, Pouyat, Richard, Fahey, Timothy, Pickett, STA, Cadenasso, Mary. Nitrate production and availability in residential soils. Ecological applications: a publication of the Ecological Society of America. 2011;21:2357-66. DOI:10.2307/41416663.

Fielding, Kelly, Hornsey, Matthew. A social identity analysis of climate change and environmental attitudes and behaviors: Insights and opportunities. Frontiers in Psychology. 2016;7.
DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00121.

Ali, Akhter, Erenstein Olaf. Assessing farmer use of climate change adaptation practices and impacts on food security and poverty in Pakistan. Climate Risk Management. 2017;16:183-194. DOI:10.1016/j.crm.2016.12.001.

Williamson, Ian, Enemark, Stig, Rajabifard, Abbas. Land Administration for Sustainable Development; 2009.

Chandler CIR. Knowledge, attitudes, and practice surveys. the international encyclopedia of anthropology. 2018;1–2.
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118924396.wbiea1387

Scott W. Institutional theory: Contributing to a Theoretical Research Program; 2005.

UNFCCC. Climate change: Impacts, vulnerabilities and adaptation in developing countries; 2010.

Tasquier G, Pongiglione F, Levrini O. Climate change: An educational proposal integrating the physical and social sciences. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2014b;116:820–825. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.304

Wang et al.; 2015.
Retrieved August 21, 2020,
Available:https://www.researchgate.net/publication/281389709_Wang_et_al_2015

Heidari MR, Norouzadeh R. Nursing students’ perspectives on clinical education. Journal of Advances in Medical Education & Professionalism. 2015; 3(1):39–43. Available:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25587554

Oversby J. Teachers’ learning about climate change education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2015;167:23–27.
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.12.637

Le QB, Nkonya E, Mirzabaev A. Biomass productivity-based mapping of global land degradation hotspots. In Economics of Land Degradation and Improvement - A Global Assessment for Sustainable Development. Springer International Publishing. 2015;55–84. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19168-3_4

Kajiado C. County Government of Kajiado Integrated Development Plan 2018-2022-Fostering Socio-Economic and political development for Sustainable Growth. 2018;15–114. Available:https://cog.go.ke/downloads/category/106-county-integrated-development-plans-2018-2022

Ishtiaq M. Book Review Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. English Language Teaching. 2019;12(5):40.
DOI:https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v12n5p40

Budnick, Andrea, Kreutz R, Draeger D. Research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Innovation in Aging. 2017;1:231-232.
DOI:10.1093/geroni/igx004.861.

Karami S, Shobeiri SM, Jafari H, Jafari H. Assessment of knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) towards climate change education (CCE) among lower secondary teachers in Tehran, Iran. International Journal of Climate Change Strategies and Management. 2017b;9(3):402–415.

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCCSM-04-2016-0043

Mwongera C, Nowak A, Notenbaert AMO, Grey S, Osiemo J, Kinyua I, Lizarazo M, Girvetz E. Climate-Smart Agricultural Value Chains: Risks and Perspectives. In The Climate-Smart Agriculture Papers. Springer International Publishing. 2019a;235–245. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92798-5_20

Warhurst, Chris, Thompson, Paul. Mapping knowledge in work: Proxies or practices?. Work Employment and Society - WORK EMPLOY SOC. 2006;20:787-800. DOI:10.1177/0950017006069815.

Mwongera C, Shikuku KM, Twyman J, Läderach, P., Ampaire E, Van Asten P, Twomlow S, Winowiecki LA. Climate smart agriculture rapid appraisal (CSA-RA): A tool for prioritizing context-specific climate smart agriculture technologies. Agricultural Systems. 2017;151:192–203.
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2016.05.009

Ouédraogo M, Houessionon P, Zougmoré RB, Partey ST. Uptake of climate-smart agricultural technologies and practices: Actual and potential adoption rates in the climate-smart village site of Mali. Sustainability (Switzerland). 2019;11(17).
DOI:https://doi.org/10.3390/su11174710

Lang T. Institutional Theory, New. In The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 2018;1–3.
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405165518.wbeosi050.pub2

Warhurst C, Thompson P. Mapping knowledge in work: proxies or practices? Work, Employment and Society. 2006;20(4):787–800.
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017006069815

Poczta-Wajda, Agnieszka. Mechanisms and effects of agricultural subsidies – a theoretical depiction; 2015.

Makate Clifton, Makate Marshall, Mango Nelson. Smallholder farmers' perceptions on climate change and the use of sustainable agricultural practices in the Chinyanja Triangle, Southern Africa. Social Sciences. 2017;6:30.
DOI:10.3390/socsci6010030

Kuwornu, John, Al-Hassan, Ramatu, Etwire, Prince, Osei-Owusu, Yaw. Adaptation Strategies of smallholder farmers to climate change and variability: Evidence from Northern Ghana. 2013;5:233-239.

Mutisya SM, Barker M. Pupils’ environmental awareness and knowledge: A springboard for action in primary schools in Kenya’s Rift valley. In Science Education International. 2011;22(1).

IFAD. Livestock Thematic Paper, Women and Pastoralism; 2012.

Jeetendra Prakash Aryal, Dil Bahadur Rahut, Sofina Maharjan, Olaf Erenstein. Factors affecting the adoption of multiple climate-smart agricultural practices in the Indo-Gangetic Plains of India; 2018.

Chowdhury, Ataharul, Odame, Helen, Leeuwis C. Transforming the roles of a public extension agency to strengthen innovation: Lessons from the National Agricultural Extension Project in Bangladesh. The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension. 2014;20. DOI:10.1080/1389224X.2013.803990.

ldersley A, Murray SJ, Corn SE. Science of the Total Environment Global an d regional an alysis of clim ate an d h um an drivers of w ild fi re. Science of the Total Environment. 2011; 409:3472–3481.
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitoten

Dekens Julie, Dazé, Angie. Conducting gender analysis to inform national adaptation plan (NAP) Processes: Reflections from six African countries; 2019.
DOI:10.13140/RG.2.2.12765.36321.

Carabine E, Simonet C. Value chain analysis for resilience in drylands (VC-ARID): identification of adaptation options in key sectors. 2018;76. Available:https://www.odi.org/sites/odi.org.uk/files/resource-documents/12286.pdf%0Ahttps://www.cabdirect.org/cabdirect/abstract/20183299617

Thornton P, Enahoro D, Njiru N, Wijk M. van, Ashley L. Program for climate-smart livestock systems. Country stocktake: Uganda; 2019. December. Available:https://cgspace.cgiar.org/handle/10568/106291

Krishnan A, Were A, Willem Te Velde D. Integrating Kenya’s small firms into leather, Textiles and garments value chains: Creating jobs under Kenya’s Big Four agenda. May 2019; 2019.

Alarcon, Pablo, Fèvre, Eric, Muinde, Patrick, Murungi, Maurice, Kiambi, Stella, Akoko, James, Rushton, Jonathan. Urban livestock keeping in the City of Nairobi: Diversity of Production Systems, Supply Chains, and Their Disease Management and Risks. Frontiers in Veterinary Science. 2017;4:171.
DOI:10.3389/fvets.2017.00171.

Dietz M. Value Chain Governance that Benefits the Poor. 2011;1–15.
  • Abstract View: 1079 times
    PDF Download: 548 times

Download Statistics

  • Linkedin
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • WhatsApp
  • Telegram
Make a Submission / Login
Information
  • For Readers
  • For Authors
  • For Librarians
Current Issue
  • Atom logo
  • RSS2 logo
  • RSS1 logo


© Copyright 2010-Till Date, Asian Journal of Agricultural Extension, Economics & Sociology. All rights reserved.