Trade Competitiveness of Palm Oil Export from ASEAN Countries
Asian Journal of Agricultural Extension, Economics & Sociology,
Page 1-7
DOI:
10.9734/ajaees/2022/v40i111679
Abstract
Aims: To study the competitiveness, import intensity and structural break of palm oil exports from ASEAN member countries to the Indian market for the period 2000 to 2020.
Data and Methodology: The relevant data was collected from UNCOMTRADE for the period of 21 years (2000 to 2020). The tools used for the analysis were Revealed Symmetric Comparative Advantage (RSCA), Import Intensity Index (III) and Chow test.
Results: The study revealed that Indonesia had lost its comparative advantage due to differential tariff rates imposed by India between Indonesia and its close competitor Malaysia. After 2011, the import intensity index clarifies that there was a gradual decrease in imports from Indonesia. However, Malaysia and Thailand showed an upward trend in import intensity index till the year 2018. After 2018, Singapore had an upward trend in import intensity. From chow test, there was a significant difference in importing palm oil from ASEAN countries to India before and after signing AIFTA (ASEAN- India Free Trade Agreement).
Conclusion: Considering India’s demand for palm oil which is expected to double by 2030, so sustainable palm oil cultivation is recommended and a balanced approach should be taken to fix the tariff rate to protect domestic producers and refineries without compromising consumer demand.
Keywords:
- AIFTA
- chow test
- comparative advantage
- import intensity index
How to Cite
References
Korinek J, Melatos M. Trade impacts of selected regional trade agreements in agriculture; 2009.
Available:https://doi.org/10.1787/18166873
Renjini VR, Kar A. Composition, intensity and competitiveness of agricultural trade between India and ASEAN. Indian Journal of Economics and Development. 2016; 12(2):249-254.
Sagar HSC, Mabano A, Roopa R, Sharmin M, Richard FJ, Clause J. India in the oil palm era: Describing India’s dependence on palm oil, recommendations for sustainable production, and opportunities to become an influential consumer. Tropical Conservation Science, 2019;12: 1940082919838918.
Pal P, Dasgupta M. Does a free trade agreement with ASEAN make sense?. Economic and Political Weekly. 2008 Nov 15;8-12.
Francis S. A sectoral impact analysis of the ASEAN-India free trade agreement. Economic and Political Weekly. 2011 Jan 8;46-55.
Balassa B. Trade liberalisation and “revealed” comparative advantage 1. The Manchester School. 1965 May;33(2):99-123.
Dalum B, Laursen K, Villumsen G. Structural change in OECD export specialisation patterns: De-specialisation and ‘stickiness’. International Review of Applied Economics. 1998;12(3):423-443.
Balu N, Ismail N. Free trade agreement–the way forward for the Malaysian palm oil industry. Oil Palm Industry Economic Journal. 2011;2:26-35.
Arip MA, Yee LS, Feng TS. Assessing the competitiveness of Malaysia and Indonesia palm oil related industry. World Review of Business Research. 2013;3(4):138-145.
Karim MF, Tiffani C. The limits of Indonesia and India Trade Cooperation: The case of import tariffs on refined palm oil 2019–2020. TRaNS: Trans-Regional and-National Studies of Southeast Asia. 2022;1-13.
Pujiati R, Firdaus M, Adhi AK, Brummer B. The impact of regional trade agreements to the commodity trade flows (Case Study: International Palm Oil Trade). In Forum Agribisnis: Agribusiness Forum. Sep. 2014;4(2):193-206.
Tandra H, Suroso AI, Syaukat Y, Najib M. The determinants of competitiveness in global palm oil trade. Economies. 2022;10(6);132.
Renjini VR, Jha GK. Oilseeds sector in India: A trade policy perspective. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 2019 Jan;89(1):73-8.
-
Abstract View: 249 times
PDF Download: 95 times
